GpsPrune development

GpsPrune is available to download from the downloads page, with the latest released version being version 24. Details of the development of forthcoming versions are given here.

Please also look at the user guide for details about the user guide now available (in PDF and EPUB formats) for GpsPrune. Your feedback is valuable and much appreciated.

Forthcoming features

The following features are on the list for version 24.* and 25. Please also see the wishlist for new features which have been proposed by users of GpsPrune, and what's new for the recently developed features.

Version 24.1

Version 25


Version 24 is now available in two forms, because it turned out there were runtime issues with Java 8. I thought that compiling with Java 11 with a target of Java 8 would work properly, but it turns out not, so there's now a separate Java 8 jar produced by a Java 8 JDK, which in turn required a handful of minor tweaks. You can get the source code from github if you use the "java8" branch.

Weather forecasts

Currently GpsPrune is able to get weather forecasts from by giving them the current latitude and longitude, and receiving either the current weather conditions or daily or three-hourly forecasts. This works brilliantly, but these services will be discontinued in June 2024 so we need to either replace or remove the functionality.

The first attempt to replace it uses a different service to get the name of a location from its latitude and longitude, and then to pass this name to the openweathermap website (in your browser) to get the forecast for that place. Unfortunately, this doesn't appear to work very reliably, and either the website doesn't recognise the place name at all, or sometimes it finds the location but no weather information. In any case the locations don't match the ones delivered from the other services. I've contacted the site for help with this, so there might be a solution — if not then the whole weather function will unfortunately have to be removed.

Gpx extensions

Gpx is a very flexible data format for our coordinate data, but most of this flexibility comes from a variety of non-standard extensions. And the handling of extensions is different depending on whether the file is Gpx version 1.0 or version 1.1.

GpsPrune has a limited and non-perfect understanding of these extensions, which is particularly apparent when it comes to representations of heart rate, course, speed, and geocache details. GpsPrune tries to overcome this limited understanding by copying the source xml (if it can), thereby usually preserving the Gpx 1.0/1.1 information and the extension tags, but there are cases where this breaks down — particularly when files with different specifications are combined (for example a 1.0 file and a 1.1 file together, or files using different extensions), or when new fields are added to a point which already has extensions.

I think that the first step is to make the export dialog a little bit more complex by allowing the user to choose between Gpx 1.0 and 1.1. Most users of course don't know or care about this, and GpsPrune's current approach of exporting as it was loaded (or 1.0 by default) works for most situations. But to handle the extensions properly, we need to more strictly control the versions.

Once this is there, it immediately raises the possibility of loading a 1.0 file and exporting as 1.1, so we need to define what happens if points have speeds — these are valid in 1.0 but not valid in standard 1.1. Do the speeds get silently removed, is a warning shown, or can an extension be selected?

If a point does use extensions (either using Gpx 1.0 or 1.1), these will need to be translated if the export version isn't the same as the loaded version. Plus, if a file using extension X is loaded together with another using extension Y, how are these exported? Are both extensions used, or should the user have to choose one? Should the user have to choose whether to convert the heart rate values from extension Y into the right structure for extension X or vice versa? Mixing extensions makes things complicated.


As always, all help with the translations will be very welcome! Please help to expand and improve the coverage of your favourite language. Please see the "translations" section below if you'd like to help.

Since February 2015, GpsPrune has a repository at GitHub. It's got all the history since version 1 in there, and the plan is to keep it updated with the latest released code. For those who find submitting git pull requests easier than submitting diffs by email or sourceforge, then this might be something for you to look at. It's also a good way of raising issues if you have questions or bug reports. I'm guessing that for most people, especially those without github accounts and those unfamiliar with git, the other methods of bug reporting and patch submission will continue to serve well.


for 23.*
for 24*
English, German,
Swiss German,
Dutch, French,
Polish, Portuguese93%92%
Chinese, Catalan95%90%
Russian, Hungarian92%87%
Romanian, Swedish89%84%
Afrikaans, Czech85%80%
Korean, Japanese63%60%
Indonesian, Farsi< 10%

The translations of GpsPrune are in greatly varying stages of completion. This table on the right summarizes the percentage of translations which are complete for each language. If you want to help with these translations, there are now three (count them, three!) ways for you to do this. The idea is that if the translation process is made as easy as possible for the translator, then the likelihood is higher that somebody might feel like helping out. So to make the entry barrier as low as possible, here are the options, in order of preference:

Obviously it would be great to get the nearly-complete languages back up to 100% again, especially those which were complete for earlier versions of GpsPrune, like for example Spanish, Catalan and Chinese.

Unfortunately there are also several languages here less than half-complete, which is why they've not been included in the release jars. You can use these files if you want (available from the download page), but obviously most of the texts are still in English. Any thoughts from users of these languages? Is there any interest in reviving or boosting these translations?

Development cost

There's an interesting tool called SLOCCount, which goes through a code tree and counts up how many lines of code there are and in which languages. It seems to ignore blank lines, and comment lines and so on, so its figure for GpsPrune is (at the time of writing) 36 thousand lines rather than the 52 thousand which a simple wc -l gives. But anyway, then it uses a formula to estimate how many person-months it would take to develop a traditional commercial product of the same size, and how many dollars you'd have to budget for it (including a bunch of overheads such as project planning and specifications etc). Clearly most of those assumptions and parameters are completely invalid for a small open-source project, but just out of interest, I tried it out. As of version 15, GpsPrune is now worth over 1 meeellion dollars! And for you, it's free :)

The estimator at openhub however comes up with a figure of only around half a million dollars, even using apparently the same parameters, so that might give some indication how meaningful the estimates are! Oddly, this tool completely ignores valuable comments in the code, and valuable text files and properties files, but inconsistently does count an xml file the same as raw code(?) and also cares whether a logical line of code is split into several lines for readability or not. Is a four-line if block really worth so much more (or so much more costly to produce) than exactly the same expression in a one-liner?

Update: there's a bunch more on this topic at development stats, including some pretty charts of GpsPrune's metrics.

Development activity

Gource screenshot

There's a very interesting tool called gource (like source but with a g), which makes very pretty animations to visualise a software tree as it grows and develops. Using the logs from the source control repository, it knows the file tree structure, it knows when each file was added, edited or removed, and by whom. And it's able to animate this, with each file represented by a little coloured ball, and each checkin causing balls to appear, move and shuffle around the bouncing tree. Check it out on youtube, it's mesmerizing.

So I tried this little tool out on the GpsPrune tree, and it works great. It shows the bursts of development (new files, often concentrated in single areas, reorganisations of files between directories) between long periods of testing and fixing (mainly edits to files, especially translations and build files). It shows the appearance of new functions like little flowers bursting into bloom, and the gradual transformation from a small bunch of dots into the current package hierarchy, as shown in this screenshot.

The purple dots shown here are the java files, the blue and green dots are the images, there's a bunch of blue translation files, and a small scattering of other file types such as xml and txt.


The following credits also appear in the "About" screen of the GpsPrune application, but it's worth repeating here - grateful thanks to all those who have helped contribute so far, by whatever means!

GpsPrune code written by
Exif code written by :Drew Noakes (
Many icons provided by :Eclipse,
Services :SRTM data courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey mirrored thanks to, Wikipedia services by geonames, maps from Openstreetmap, weather forecasts from, geocaches from, photos from, routing by GraphHopper.
Deprecated services :Maps from,,, and, geocaches from, photos from, Gpsies download and upload by
Translators :Ramon (ch), Miguel (es), Inés (es), Piotr (pl), Petrovsk (fr), Josatoc (it), weehal (pl), theYinYeti (fr), Rothermographer (ro), Sam (zh), Rudolph (af), nazotoko (ja), katpatuka (tr), Rémi (fr), Marcus (pt), Ali (fa), Javier (es), Jeroen (nl), prot_d (cz), György (hu), HooAU (ko), Sergey (ru), Gilles (fr), serhijdubyk (ua), Péter (hu), Matteo (it), Peter (hu), Oana (ro), Cristian (ro), Roman (ru), Erkki (fi), Paolo (it), Maciej (pl), Erik (sv), Carlos (es), Tche333 (fr), J.M. (ca)
Technical feedback
and patches :
Piotr, freegeographytools, Rudolf, Steven, Jose, Jeshi, Denny, Thomas, Jozef, Gregor, Robert, Jani, zapfen, Joerg, Alexandre, Anti, José, Arvee, Sebastic, PeHar, fperrin
Mac know-how :Tyme, Daniel, Michael, Richard, Marek
Translations helped by :Open Office, Gpsdrive, Babelfish, Leo, Launchpad, Wiktionary, DeepL
Development tools :GNU/Linux (originally Mandriva, now Debian and Mint), Java (originally Sun, now OpenJDK), an IDE (originally Eclipse, now moving to IDEA), version control (originally Subversion, now git), Gimp, Inkscape, bug-spotting (was findbugs, now IDEA and spotbugs)
Other tools :Garble, GPSBabel, Povray, Exiftool, Google Earth, Gnuplot, JOSM, TeX Live, Sigil
Thanks to :Friends and loved ones, for encouragement and support

Alternatives for the GUI

As discussed above, the appearance of the standard java/swing GUI under linux (especially the fonts) is sometimes disappointing. So if the "Nimbus" or "GTK" themes don't please everyone, we could perhaps think of alternatives to java and Swing to present the GpsPrune GUI.

Qt, using either C++ or Python

screengrab of Qt prototype

This first idea has been floated for a while now, with the following basic prototype made to demonstrate the basic functionality. It shows the compilation of C++ code into a GUI application, shows the basic layout including menus, toolbar, status bar, the split main screen and various resizing behaviour. It also shows the techniques for internationalization of all the texts using Qt's standard translation mechanism.

This example uses natively-compiled C++, but in theory it could use Python and Qt instead. This has the advantage that the GpsPrune code wouldn't need to be natively compiled separately for each possible platform (of which there are many!) but instead could just be distributed as one single source file. However it would have two disadvantages - it would need a python runtime in order to run, so an additional large dependency for everybody to install, and more importantly it would also rely on the PyQt library to be installed, which adds more fiddling.

Java, using SWT

screengrab of SWT prototype

In October 2014, a new experiment started to rebuild the main GpsPrune GUI using Java and SWT. The results are shown to the right, laying out the basic GUI elements and getting the resizing to work properly. There's a menu and toolbar, a status bar, and exactly the same multi-language support from the "normal" GpsPrune application rather than a separate Qt technique. This saves translation effort as the identical files can be simply re-used.

This needs some more investigation to see if it's worthwhile, or if the SWT requirements could cause problems for users on the various platforms. But all it needs is a java runtime and the SWT library, both of which are platform-dependent but available for all the major platforms. For the major linux distributions these things are already included.

The current idea is to gradually expand this prototype, gradually taking in more components from the "normal" GpsPrune and seeing what difficulties arise. Apart from simply replicating the existing dialogs and functions, there are two proposed guidelines to shape further improvements. Firstly, each dialog should be able to rebuild itself, so that changing the language will have an instant effect everywhere without requiring a restart. And secondly, the functions which need dialogs should be completely separated from the actual data manipulation that they do - this will make automatic testing easier and will also allow a "Redo" button to be implemented.

Update 2022: OK, so the "current idea" didn't really come to fruition, but the "Redo" function is finally on its way (planned for maybe version 25). It's turning into a huge refactoring exercise, but the data manipulation will at the end be separated from the Gui, and the benefits of testing are already apparent. There's still no huge incentive to push for SWT, and no loud calls from users unhappy with the Swing look. Maybe the introduction of the themes has reduced the pressure.

The following jar is for those interested in what this SWT version could look like. It's very basic so far, and doesn't actually do much editing or display of the files. But at least you can see if SWT works on your platform, try out the Help menu and Settings menu, load a kml or gpx file to scroll through the points, see the altitude profile and delete a single point.

Jar file

SWT code for testing (300 kB)
gpsprune_swt_011.jar - Get this one if you want to try out the very basic SWT prototype

This seems to be a fairly promising start, with a few things working already, but obviously an enormous amount of functionality still missing. Looking at the time taken to get this far, and the amount of (re)work required to get everything back up to the usefulness of the regular GpsPrune application, it seems like the proposed benefits are perhaps not great enough to justify the effort. Maybe the translation to SWT would be more reasonable if that was the only change required, rather than the restructuring of Functions and TrackOperations being done here, but then the benefit is even smaller, basically just an improved appearance on some platforms. This effort could probably be more usefully applied to enhancing the existing GpsPrune rather than re-doing a lot of the existing work.

Screenshots // How-tos // How-tos (français) // How-tos (deutsch) // How-tos (español) // User guide // Demo videos // Problem-solving // Configuration // Download // Dependencies // What's new // Development // Wishlist // History // Old Screenshots // Internet Fame // User survey // Dev stats